Showing posts with label Leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leadership. Show all posts

Friday, November 26, 2010

Social Awareness and Leadership

What makes people want to follow a leader? What makes them - in the most extreme cases - willing to lay down their lives for that person?

At their best, leaders are 'living symbols' of a particular set of values that the followers subscribe to, enabling an almost spiritual feeling of being part of something greater than oneself. Think of what Churchill was to the British in the Second World War, what Gandhi was to the non-violence movement, or, to take some business examples, what Richard Branson is to Virgin staff or Steve Jobs to Apple devotees.

Four hundred years ago, being burned at the stake was the official punishment for the crime of heresy in England. It was less than two hundred years ago that slavery was abolished in the British Empire. Over time, our values system has evolved to the point where we no longer find these practices acceptable. Culture and values systems develop over time. The best leaders assist in the evolution of an organization's values system or culture by calling to and encouraging the elements that are ready to make the leap to the next level. Leaders are also to an extent a blank canvas onto which their followers project elements of their own values systems. Which values are appealed to and projected - the best or the worst - will depend on what the leader says and does.

As part of this projection process, followers make sense of a leader's words and actions by making up a 'story' about them. In the follower's mind, the leader becomes the hero of a narrative constructed partly from pre-existing archetypes (the king, the wise woman, the father, the magician) which are common to society as a whole, and partly from the traditions and culture of that particular organization.

The meaning of what we say, or what we do, depends on its context. Delivering a hilariously accurate character assessment to a close colleague will mean one thing over a few friendly pints, but quite another in the middle of a board meeting. So the words, actions and qualities of a leader are assessed in the context of the culture in which they are operating. Depending on the context against which they are played out, the same actions could be viewed as:

Decisive - or ruthless

Supportive - or mollycoddling

Taking an interest - or overcontrolling

Visionary - or out of touch with reality

(thanks to Peter Freeth of ciauk.com for this insight)

One of the great leadership skills is the ability to 'read' the culture and emotional climate of the organization successfully and to communicate and act in ways that are appropriate to that context. Successful leaders act in ways that are consistent with the 'narrative' that their followers have constructed (if this is a positive view) or that change the terms of the narrative (if it needs to be changed). This consistency does not mean that the leader's actions have to be predictable - the best leaders can surprise their people from time to time, but the surprises will be positive ones - just that the followers can make sense of them in terms of the organization's 'story'.

Without this empathy for organizational culture and the feelings of the people who are part of it, anything that the leader does is liable to backfire and be misinterpreted.

The practical implication of this is that the better you understand the culture of the organization you work in and the feelings of the people you lead, the more effective you will be as a leader.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Are Entrepreneurship and Leadership the Same?

Do entrepreneurs and leaders possess some or all of the same qualities?

These thoughts struck when thinking about the qualities of leaders in business. Good leaders are usually strong willed, so are entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs possess the self confidence to follow their dream and achieve goals, more in a strategic and planned sense, so do good leaders.

Good leaders are often energetic and get things done, so do successful entrepreneurs. As I am writing this I'm just thinking of these qualities as I go and the matches keep coming.

Successful entrepreneurs often end up leading the organisation they have built. A good example being Richard Branson. In my experience good leaders tend to be dissatisfied once their goals have been achieved. They need a new challenge to stimulate them. Winston Churchill was a brilliant war time leader but not so successful as peace time Prime Minister.

Entrepreneurs sometimes bore easily and after starting one successful enterprise will go off and do some thing similar again. They also, like good leaders need the stimulation that new challenges create.

Where a difference comes in is that good leaders can be found in all fields of activity leading and managing commercial and non commercial organisations. Whereas successful entrepreneurs are mostly found in commercial activities, making money.

Can entrepreneurship and leadership be taught? This could cause a lot of debate. To me leadership comes from experience and a desire of the strong willed to make a difference. Entrepreneurship on the other hand comes from a desire to make money and this is often a personal driver.

There are a number common qualities as I think I have shown, but there is also a big difference in where the motivation comes from. You will find more about entrepreneurs and leaders from the links in the resource box.